Winning Attorneys are Talking
“My firm tried to compile notes on judges for years – with no success. This is just what we need.”
“This site lets me research a judge in a way I never could before.”
Overview of Tentative Rulings
The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable.
Attorneys could call the court and listen to a looped recording of the next day’s tentative rulings. Now, many departments post tentative rulings via their local court website.
- NIKELAB W AIR VAPORMAX 97 Men's and Women's Running shoes , Black,
- NIKE MERCURIAL SUPERFLY V AG-PRO TOTAL CRIMSON-VOLT-BLACK SZ 11.5 [831955-870]
- Nike 599263 Mens Zoom Soldier TB Mid Top Basketball Training Sneakers shoes
- RARE Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Black Gum sz 8.5 555088-020
- 150 Nike Wmns sz 6 Zoom Fly SP London Neon orange Reflective AJ8229-108
- Adidas Iniki Runner Boost Solar Yellow BB2094 NWT NO BOX 100%AUTHENTIC Men shoes
- shoes ADIDAS women Sneakers black CP8928
- Women Adidas B41595 Stan Smith Running shoes Purple white sneakers
- Adidas NMD_R1 Runner W Nomad Women's White Running Camo Pack Solar Red G27933
- NEW ADIDAS WOMEN'S ORIGINALS SUPERSTAR SHOES CLEAR PINK TRIPLE
The simplest of tentative rulings indicate nothing more than an intent to grant or deny. Thanks to hard-working judges, tentative rulings have evolved greatly over the past two decades.
Today, many tentative rulings go far beyond a simple ‘grant’ or ‘deny’ and are as thorough and well-written as published decisions from the California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court.
In fact, because the higher courts often focus on narrowly-framed issues, tentative rulings from trial court judges often provide a broader analysis.
Why Research Tentative Rulings?
Researching tentative rulings can:
- help you prepare a more thorough report to your client or carrier
- illustrate how a particular judge has handled specific issues in the past
- reveal which cases your judge finds most persuasive on a given topic
- address issues for which there is little or no appellate authority
- provide a quick overview of issues you’re not familiar with