Winning Attorneys are Talking
“My firm tried to compile notes on judges for years – with no success. This is just what we need.”
“This site lets me research a judge in a way I never could before.”
Overview of Tentative Rulings
The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable.
Attorneys could call the court and listen to a looped recording of the next day’s tentative rulings. Now, many departments post tentative rulings via their local court website.
- Nike PG 2.5 TB Team Bank Game Royal bluee Duke BQ8454-400 Size 9.5
- NIKE SFB FIELD 2 - 8 SAGE GREEN MILITARY TACTICAL BOOTS AO7507 201 [ALL SIZES]
- Nike SB Portmore Ulralight CN
- NIKE Huarache 08 BBALL Sneakers Basketball SHOES Varsity PURPLE Rare 2008 sz 11
- Nike Air Jordan 1 Reimagined Sage High Top Sneaker Off White Size 7.5 BNIB
- New Adidas NMD R2 PK Roni BB2909 Collegiate Navy Red White Men's 6.5 Women's 8
- Adidas Neo CF Advantage CL Womens Casual shoes Lifestyle Sneakers Pick 1
- Adidas Womens EQT Support Sock Primeknit shoes Sz 8 B37533
- Women Adidas BB7562 Edge bounce Running shoes white pink Sneakers
- Adidas Women's Solar Glide W Running shoes F34988 Size 7 New in the box
The simplest of tentative rulings indicate nothing more than an intent to grant or deny. Thanks to hard-working judges, tentative rulings have evolved greatly over the past two decades.
Today, many tentative rulings go far beyond a simple ‘grant’ or ‘deny’ and are as thorough and well-written as published decisions from the California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court.
In fact, because the higher courts often focus on narrowly-framed issues, tentative rulings from trial court judges often provide a broader analysis.
Why Research Tentative Rulings?
Researching tentative rulings can:
- help you prepare a more thorough report to your client or carrier
- illustrate how a particular judge has handled specific issues in the past
- reveal which cases your judge finds most persuasive on a given topic
- address issues for which there is little or no appellate authority
- provide a quick overview of issues you’re not familiar with