Winning Attorneys are Talking
“My firm tried to compile notes on judges for years – with no success. This is just what we need.”
“This site lets me research a judge in a way I never could before.”
Overview of Tentative Rulings
The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable.
Attorneys could call the court and listen to a looped recording of the next day’s tentative rulings. Now, many departments post tentative rulings via their local court website.
- NIKE AIR JORDAN RETRO 6 CIGAR Champagne All Star Slam Dunk Infrared Bred Sz 11
- Vintage Nike Air 1998 mens leather running shoes, size 11 UK 46 EU RARE
- JORDAN CP3.X SHOES CHRIS PAUL MENS SZ 8.5
- NEW MEN'S NIKE AIR Vapormax FK Flyknit Utility size 15 (AH6834 006)
- Nike Kyrie 5 Concepts TV PE 3 Size 11 - 100% Authentic
- NIKE SB NYJAH FREE TRIPLE BLACK HOUSTON SZ 8-14
- Nike Air Jordan Fly 89 IV 4 bluee Black Men Lifestyle shoes Sneakers 940267-402
- NIKE MEN AIR ZOOM FLY 2 RUNNING SHOES SIZE 13 707606 009 EUC
- AIR JORDAN FUTURE LOW, 2015 - ITEM NUMBER 1281–36
- New Mens Air Monarch IV Training shoes Sz 9.5 Extra Red Black White
The simplest of tentative rulings indicate nothing more than an intent to grant or deny. Thanks to hard-working judges, tentative rulings have evolved greatly over the past two decades.
Today, many tentative rulings go far beyond a simple ‘grant’ or ‘deny’ and are as thorough and well-written as published decisions from the California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court.
In fact, because the higher courts often focus on narrowly-framed issues, tentative rulings from trial court judges often provide a broader analysis.
Why Research Tentative Rulings?
Researching tentative rulings can:
- help you prepare a more thorough report to your client or carrier
- illustrate how a particular judge has handled specific issues in the past
- reveal which cases your judge finds most persuasive on a given topic
- address issues for which there is little or no appellate authority
- provide a quick overview of issues you’re not familiar with