Item specifics
| Condition: | New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition | EU Shoe Size: | 47.5 |
| Sole: | Rubber | Country/Region of Manufacture: | Indonesia |
| Brand: | Nike | Style: | Trainers |
| Lining: | Textile | Product Line: | Jordan |
| Model: | Air Max 95 Essential | Upper Material: | Synthetic |
| Main Colour: | white/persian violet-cool grey | MPN: | 749766 110 |
Winning Attorneys are Talking
“My firm tried to compile notes on judges for years – with no success. This is just what we need.”
“This site lets me research a judge in a way I never could before.”
Overview of Tentative Rulings
The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable.
Attorneys could call the court and listen to a looped recording of the next day’s tentative rulings. Now, many departments post tentative rulings via their local court website.
- Nike Dunk High Sz 8 White University bluee Obsidian 317982 412 RARE 01 2010
- Nike Air Jordan Hare 7
- NIKE MEN'S KAISHI 2.0 SHOES black white 833411 010
- Nike Air Jordan Retro 3 Stealth ( 136064-003 ) Size 9.5 OG
- New Nike Tiempo Legend V FG Women's Soccer Cleats Sz 6.5 744951 400
- Adidas eqt support adv mens
- Nike Kobe AD PE Mens Size 15 bluee Basketball shoes Demar Derozan AQ2721 900
- NIKE AIR JORDAN ZOOM TENACITY 88 Retro 3 SAFARI orange Black 95 1 Air Max sz 13
- Nike Dunk High Supreme FFF Pack French Football Federation Men 10.5 France
- 2013 Nike Air Jordan VIII 8 Retro WHITE BLACK TRUE RED BUGS BUNNY 305381-103 13
The simplest of tentative rulings indicate nothing more than an intent to grant or deny. Thanks to hard-working judges, tentative rulings have evolved greatly over the past two decades.
Today, many tentative rulings go far beyond a simple ‘grant’ or ‘deny’ and are as thorough and well-written as published decisions from the California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court.
In fact, because the higher courts often focus on narrowly-framed issues, tentative rulings from trial court judges often provide a broader analysis.
Why Research Tentative Rulings?
Researching tentative rulings can:
- help you prepare a more thorough report to your client or carrier
- illustrate how a particular judge has handled specific issues in the past
- reveal which cases your judge finds most persuasive on a given topic
- address issues for which there is little or no appellate authority
- provide a quick overview of issues you’re not familiar with