
Item specifics
Condition: | New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition | Brand: | Nike |
Width: | Medium (D, M) | Style: | Running |
Color: | Night Maroon/Bright Crimson | US Shoe Size (Men's): | 11.5 |
UPC: | 886912834700 |
Winning Attorneys are Talking
“My firm tried to compile notes on judges for years – with no success. This is just what we need.”
“This site lets me research a judge in a way I never could before.”
Overview of Tentative Rulings
The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable.
Attorneys could call the court and listen to a looped recording of the next day’s tentative rulings. Now, many departments post tentative rulings via their local court website.
- Nike Kobe IX Mid EXT QS Men's Basketball shoes
- NIKE Lunar Trout 2 Wolf Grey Flywire Baseball Metal Spikes Cleats New Mens 13 14
- Brand New Nike zoom training women's shoes size 7.5
- Yeezy Boost 350 V2 Green
- Adidas Originals ZX 500 RM Grey Clear orange US Mens 11 NWB
- [B37458] Womens Adidas Pod-S3.1 W
- SHOES SCHUHE NB NEW BALANCE ML574 LEATHER SMB SMG AW OTD OTB EPA EPC AGES
- VINTAGE NIKE OUTBREAK shoes 9.5 SUPER RARE AIR Hot Pink OG's Jordan ACG Supreme
- RARE VANS x WTAPS Syndicate S Era Burgundy Red Bones Cordovan Sz 10 Men’s 2011
- NIKE FLYKNIT RACER MENS SZ 11 WOMENS SZ 9.5 FIREBERRY VOLT PINK 526628 607 150
- NIKE AIR MAX 95 ESSENTIAL WHITE COOL GREY 749766-105 MENS SIZE 6 WOMEN 7.5
- Nike Romaleos 3 Mens Weightlifting Squatting shoes SZ Black Grey Red 852933-600
- Rare 2012 NIKE Air Force 1 One Foamposite Pro Low Pewter Sz 18 532461 001 (B22)
The simplest of tentative rulings indicate nothing more than an intent to grant or deny. Thanks to hard-working judges, tentative rulings have evolved greatly over the past two decades.
Today, many tentative rulings go far beyond a simple ‘grant’ or ‘deny’ and are as thorough and well-written as published decisions from the California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court.
In fact, because the higher courts often focus on narrowly-framed issues, tentative rulings from trial court judges often provide a broader analysis.
Why Research Tentative Rulings?
Researching tentative rulings can:
- help you prepare a more thorough report to your client or carrier
- illustrate how a particular judge has handled specific issues in the past
- reveal which cases your judge finds most persuasive on a given topic
- address issues for which there is little or no appellate authority
- provide a quick overview of issues you’re not familiar with